Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: AIM
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts () patriot net>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Christopher Hicks wrote:
Blocking AIM is tough. It tries every port it can including things that are surely 'ok' for most firewalls like 80 110. Since you can't do it via port-blocking they've probably blocked the ip blocks for the AIM servers.
That's not all that tough, the destinations haven't moved in quite a while, you can also block the two protocols, even tunneled if you wanted to do more work.
instead of homework.) The only way around the ISP's firewall is to get somebody to tunnel your traffic. That'll require some sort of VPN between your box and somebox outside your ISP. That would solve your other problem as well.
People suggesting work arounds should also note that if working around a firewall is against policy, it could be cause for serious trouble, from administrative to *criminal* charges[1] depending on the jurisdiction, laws, intent, method and protocol. Someone has instituted a policy for a reason, and exceptions to, or questions about the policy should go back through the appropriate channels. Since firewalls are part of the instantiation of the policy, purposefully going around them (especially coupled with public mailing list posts asking how) proves intent quite nicely.
What sort of ISP blocks AIM anyway? Switch or get DSL or something.
As Jim pointed out, almost obviously a school does- "The firewall ate my homework!" Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions proberts () patriot net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." probertson () trusecure com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: AIM Jim Seymour (Oct 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AIM Christopher Hicks (Oct 01)
- Re: AIM Paul D. Robertson (Oct 01)
- RE: AIM Noonan, Wesley (Oct 01)
- RE: AIM Nieveler, Juergen (Oct 01)
- RE: AIM Paul D. Robertson (Oct 01)
- RE: AIM Stiennon,Richard (Oct 01)
- RE: AIM Jim Seymour (Oct 01)
- RE: AIM Bill Olah (Oct 02)
- Remote access problem James X (Oct 03)
- RE: AIM kaptain (Oct 03)
- RE: AIM Paul D. Robertson (Oct 03)