Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Interlopers on the WLAN
From: "Philip J. Koenig" <pjklist () ekahuna com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 00:23:55 -0800
Please forgive if this has been covered before, I'm not reading the group daily these days. Is it reasonable to assume that those who access WLANs without the permission of the owner are violating the same cybercrime laws that apply to any unauthorized access of a computer network? Some have recently argued this is not the case if someone doesn't "enable the security features", but personally I don't see the distinction between this kind of activity and anything normally prohibited by laws such as California Penal Code section 502a and various other cybercrime laws. It doesn't seem to me that the law makes a distinction about whether the network in question was secured or not. (what does 'secured' mean anyway?) TIA, Phil -- Philip J. Koenig pjklist () ekahuna com Electric Kahuna Systems -- Computers & Communications for the New Millenium _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Interlopers on the WLAN Philip J. Koenig (Nov 05)
- Re: Interlopers on the WLAN Al Potter (Nov 05)
- Re: Interlopers on the WLAN Mikael Olsson (Nov 05)
- Re: Interlopers on the WLAN Frank O'Dwyer (Nov 05)
- Re: Interlopers on the WLAN R. DuFresne (Nov 06)
- Re: Interlopers on the WLAN Philip J. Koenig (Nov 06)
- Re: Interlopers on the WLAN R. DuFresne (Nov 06)
- Re: Interlopers on the WLAN R. DuFresne (Nov 06)
- RE: Interlopers on the WLAN Bill Royds (Nov 06)
- RE: Interlopers on the WLAN Frank O'Dwyer (Nov 06)
- RE: Interlopers on the WLAN Philip J. Koenig (Nov 06)
- RE: Interlopers on the WLAN Frank O'Dwyer (Nov 06)