Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Cisco 2621 opinions
From: Patrick Darden <darden () armc org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:12:47 -0400 (EDT)
Joe, The 2621 series can handle, in fast-switching mode, 25kpps. If simple packet filtering is in place, half that. If you are using IPFW IOS then half that. If you are using extensive rule sets, then half that. Let's say you get about 6kpps. A standard packet is 64 bytes, so 6000X64==384KBps. This is equivalent to 3mbps. Not even ethernet speed. And this is without an extensive rule set. Even with no filtering, max routing in fast-switching mode is about 12mbps. With CBAC and extensive lists, this could go down to 1.5mpbs. ymmv. -- --Patrick Darden Internetworking Manager -- 706.475.3312 darden () armc org -- Athens Regional Medical Center On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, joe macdonald wrote:
Patrick, Thanks for the response. So the 2621 would barf if it had to handle brust speeds of 100Mbit/s (aggregate) with only a couple access-list rules (e.g. to deny connections to itself and a Linux-based firewall)? What about if it had to sustain 50-60Mbit/s? There will be no servers on the other side of it, all servers will be on the same subnet as the desktop machines. Thanks --- Patrick Darden <darden () armc org> wrote:The 2600 series is really designed as a border router for slow bandwidth connections. 2XT1s is really the most it can comfortably handle. IPFWIOS with CBAC is a great cheap firewall solution--for a small office. However, it is extremely limited (it does stateful packet inspection for around 70 different protocols), and eats up the CPU cycles. Someone mentioned reflexive access lists as a possibility, and stated that they are stateful. They are stateful in a sense, but they do not keep track of tcp sequence numbers so they are not stateful in a security context. There is a large discussion of IPFWIOS vs. reflexive access lists available in the archives. 175 ethernet computers are going to saturate a 2600 very quickly if anything is on the other side of the router/firewall (file servers, etc.). If the only other choice is the PIX, then I heartily recommend the PIX. It was designed for high-bandwidth situations. It is a great firewall. A linux or bsd based computer would do a great job as well, using ipchains or whatever. And it would be cheap. -- --Patrick Darden Internetworking Manager -- 706.475.3312 darden () armc org -- Athens Regional Medical Center On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, joe macdonald wrote:Hello all, I have a rather simple question that I would appreciate feedback on. I have a network of about 175 computers that I'm looking to put behind a Cisco 2621 router and also deploy it as a firewall. I'm new to the Ciscoworld,so I'm wondering how well these devices work as a router/firewall and how drastic the learning curve will be (I have deployed firewalls in the pastusingipfw, iptables, ipchains on Unix systems). Also,mynetwork isn't very big, but is the 2621 a suitable choice, or would a higher end model be necessary? Would a PIX be able to do this job better? (it'snotexactly a comlpex routing situation, but is thePIXstrickly a firewall?) Thanks. Any opinions are greatly appreciated. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs comhttp://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Cisco 2621 opinions joe macdonald (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions John Adams (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Nick Drage (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Charles W. Swiger (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Patrick M. Hausen (Jul 16)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Nick Drage (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions John Adams (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Patrick Darden (Jul 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cisco 2621 opinions Henry Sieff (Jul 13)
- RE: Cisco 2621 opinions Kent, Ashley (Jul 15)
- RE: Cisco 2621 opinions Brian Ford (Jul 15)
- RE: Cisco 2621 opinions Iannaccone, Al (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Patrick Darden (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Brian Ford (Jul 16)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Patrick Darden (Jul 16)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Carson Gaspar (Jul 16)