Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: [fw-wiz] NAT with multiple addresses.
From: "Skip Frizzell" <skip () blindpanic com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:35:21 -0400 (EDT)
if you intend to leave each machine on it's own number then you might better use a bridging firewall and not bother with NAT. I don't do much IRC so having everyone NAT of one IP is no concern to me. (can someone explain why this might be a problem?) this way each station has it's own public IP, but you still have access control and logging. a best solution might be to have your web and FTP served through an application proxy and only allow out the things that ONLY work through direct connection. you have a classic service vs security quandry. g'luck. -=Skip http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/mini/Bridge+Firewall+DSL.html
I am trying to install a firewall in an extremely weird network connection to the Internet, and I was wondering if there was someone willing to help me out.
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- NAT with multiple addresses. Marcelo Coronel (Sep 17)
- Re: [fw-wiz] NAT with multiple addresses. Skip Frizzell (Sep 17)
- Re: NAT with multiple addresses. Dhiran Rajbhandari (Sep 18)
- Re: NAT with multiple addresses. Wes Chalfant (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NAT with multiple addresses. rob . roberson (Sep 18)