Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform
From: David Pearl <david_pearl_sf () yahoo com>
Date: 18 May 2001 01:14:58 -0000
Paul, There have been a number of 3rd party articles on the two products... When I was evaluating fw/vpn for our network, I searched the web and found a number of articles on CommWeb, Network Computing, eWeek, Tolly Group, Network World, etc. What it boiled down to was security, performance, manageability, support, and of course, cost. NetScreen ranked high on all four counts. Since both use Stateful Inspection, security was tight. Although I ranked NetScreen a little higher because they use a non-commercial operating system that can't be purchased and therefore, reverse engineered to find the holes. Performance on the NetScreen is tops, bar none, due to their 3rd generation ASIC. The Nokia boxes are really legacy-based PCs with CheckPoint software running on them. Manageability between the two is close due to highly intuitive web interfaces. Both of them have global management options via Provider 1 and Global Pro. NetScreen also has built-in SSH and SSL for secure management.
From conversations with their support departments,
they seem to be similar. Checkpoint being better than Nokia (for obvious reasons), and NetScreen had a very capable set of staff as well. Both companies have worldwide presence and well-developed channels. Cost. Here's an area where they really diverge. CheckPoint/Nokia with their confusing licensing schemes and proliferation of software offerings made it a pain in the rear for complex deployments. NetScreen, however, does not have such licensing arrangements. Pay for the boxes and support, and that is pretty much it... As far as H/A, both of them employ it. My testing showed both of them performing fully stateful failover in less than one second. I was became a little concerned when I was simulating a power outage by cutting the power abruptly and when one of the Nokia boxes experienced a software corruption and needed some support to be revived... No such experience on the NetScreens and furthermore, they booted up very quickly... I hope this helps a little. If not, again, there are plenty of third-party articles available on the web... Cheers, David P.
Hey... Has anyone seen a feature/performance
comparison of the above two product lines, particularly in HA configurations?
Else has anyone done their own analysis they are
willing to share?
Many thanks, Paul Murphy. -------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
CRESTCo Ltd. The views expressed above
are not necessarily those
33 Cannon Street. held by CRESTCo Limited. London EC4M 5SB (UK) +44 (020) 7849 0000 http://www.crestco.co.uk -------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________ ____
firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform Paul Murphy (May 11)
- RE: Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform Ofir Arkin (May 13)
- Re: Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform Shaul Efraim (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform bob loblaw (May 14)
- Re: Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform David Pearl (May 30)
- Re: Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform Yang Lee (May 30)
- Re: Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform Shaul Efraim (May 31)
- Re: Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform George Capehart (May 31)
- Re: Nokia IP platform Versus Netscreen Platform Yang Lee (May 30)