Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Firewall-1 platforms (end of thread, I hope.)
From: "shawn . moyer" <shawn () net-connect net>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:38:51 -0600
Welp, time to eat crow. :)=) I poked around a bit and found some docs from when I had worked with this a year ago, and yes, we had another piece in addition to VRRP to keep both firewalls active. We used some small Arrowpoint (now Cisco) and / or Foundry L4 switches to do the additional firewall load balancing work. I knew all those network guys standing around when I was setting the firewalls up were doing *something*... :) In a design without this, Barney and Andrew are correct, you generally would be doing active / standby only. Caveats: 1. You would not need to set different default routes up on the boxes that route through the firewalls, just point them to the VIP / VRID. Still not sure why it's referenced that way in the RFC. 2. This still came out as a more cost-effective solution (if not by much) for us than the Sun / Stonebeat setup, because of the throughput on Nokia versus an equivalent Sun setup. We would have had to go with E250's to get comparable performance (even in active / standby) to an IP440. 3. There are some references out there to doing this without a loadbalancer via some crafty uses of BGP4 or another weight-based routing protocol. Since the Nokia's will talk BGP and OSPF, this could be an option. The trick there is making sure you don't end up with assymetric routing. 4. I still don't like Stonebeat. Sorry. :) You could probably still do this with just load-balancers and shared state between firewalls via FW-1 HA (sync.conf) stuff, though. Some more references: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/117/fw_load_balancing.html http://sysadmin.oreilly.com/news/bourke_1100.html --shawn -- s h a w n m o y e r shawn () net-connect net The universe did not invent justice; man did. Unfortunately, man must reside in the universe. -- Zelazny _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms, (continued)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms shawn . moyer (Mar 07)
- RE: RE: Firewall-1 platforms Joe Ippolito (Mar 07)
- RE: RE: Firewall-1 platforms Chuck Fasching (Mar 07)
- RE: RE: Firewall-1 platforms Kalat, Andrew (ISS Atlanta) (Mar 07)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms shawn . moyer (Mar 07)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms Barney Wolff (Mar 09)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms shawn . moyer (Mar 09)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms Barney Wolff (Mar 09)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms shawn . moyer (Mar 09)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms Barney Wolff (Mar 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Firewall-1 platforms (end of thread, I hope.) shawn . moyer (Mar 09)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms shawn . moyer (Mar 07)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms hermit1 (Mar 10)
- Re: RE: Firewall-1 platforms hesselsp (Mar 09)