Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: regarding poduct
From: sathyanarayanan <satsv55 () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:54:14 -0800 (PST)
hi John, i had little bit phrased the question wrongly, it is not webserver, but getting into the internal network itself.(as we normally map a drive or space to someother guy from our system , giving right for him to use in our computer.) Likewise the client would be given right to somespace for accessing his files stored by us , inside our network , for a stipulated lease period. when the period expired he should pay again to get the rights to access the files.I am just wondering whether there is any software that would do automatically disabiling the client when the lease period expires. thanks yours sathya --- John Adams <jna () retina net> wrote:
You can handle this using existing system tools. If your webserver is Solaris or Linux, use 'usermod' If your webserver is NT, use Users and Groups to set an expiry date for his account. -john On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, sathyanarayanan wrote:Hi guys, I am in search of a product which does the following function. When a client comes to our office and gets a loginidto access our webserver for a period of time. when the time period expires , we are in need of product which denies him access to our web serverorweb site or the files to which he is given access, automatically . Is there a any security product , which preventshisaccess by temporary locking his computer fromaccessto our site, using his IP address or our IPaddress,unless we give him a password , which enables him again to access our site. yours sathyanarayanan
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- regarding poduct sathyanarayanan (Mar 11)
- Re: regarding poduct John Adams (Mar 13)
- Re: regarding poduct sathyanarayanan (Mar 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: regarding poduct Loomis, Rip (Mar 16)
- RE: regarding poduct J B (Mar 18)
- Re: regarding poduct John Adams (Mar 13)