Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Ports still bound on W2K?
From: Don Tuer <Don_Tuer () dtaadv on ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:45:32 -0500
Hi: I'm still fighting with open ports on my web server, W2K. I have created TCP/IP filters to only let in 25,53, and 80. Yet NMAP shows the following ports open. Port State Service 25/tcp open smtp 53/tcp open domain 80/tcp open http 389/tcp open ldap <- issue #1 1002/tcp open unknown <- issue #2 What I have done: Run TCPView - does not show either of these ports open Run Fport - does not show either of these ports open Run Netstat - does not show either of these ports open Telnet to these ports, I get the following: bash-2.04$ telnet myhost.com 389 Trying 64.231.73.171... Connected to myhost.com. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. bash-2.04$ telnet myhost.com 1002 Trying 64.231.73.171... Connected to myhost.com. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. bash-2.04$ Port 389 is the LDAP port but this server does not run Active Directory. Port 1002 is unknown. Question: Does anyone know of any other way to identify what services have these ports open? Thanks Don _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Ports still bound on W2K? Don Tuer (Jan 18)