Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: DMZ Archtecture - Using public address space vs. usi ng Private Ad dress space and NAT
From: "Behm, Jeffrey L." <BehmJL () bvsg com>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 13:37:56 -0500
IMHO, this is not a particularly strong reason to make a high-impact architectural decision like RFC1918 and NAT. Major upheavals like moving a site from one ISP's address space to another is a big challenge for many reasons, changing the addresses should be a microscopic issue in comparison.
If (<- Big if) properly configured, changing the addresses should be the ONLY issue when moving a site from one ISP's address space to another's. Perhaps I am missing some of the other challenges. Of course, site has not yet been very clearly defined, so it could mean anything from an entire office to a single web site. <snip> _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE: DMZ Archtecture - Using public address space vs. usi ng Private Ad dress space and NAT Kalat, Andrew (ISS Atlanta) (Aug 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: DMZ Archtecture - Using public address space vs. usi ng Private Ad dress space and NAT Behm, Jeffrey L. (Aug 05)