Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Re: AirGap's... one way protection
From: "Harris, Tim" <tharris () ocair com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:58:56 -0700
At what level is the "e-gap" unidirectional? If it is truly unidirectional then how would I verify that the information was received correctly or even at all? I should think that if I were to use it for storage of credit card transactions, it would behoove me to be able to guarantee that it was received/processed. If I can't even do some level of confirmation across the gap how can I trust it except blind faith? If I'm counting on that transaction for $$ I want to KNOW that it is saved safely.
etc.) You could pass the credit card information through an e-Gap in a one way fashion. By using this layer of protection, even if an attacker could
I think the ability to enforce unidirectional transactions in hardware is one of the main differences between Whale's e-Gap and a standard firewall.
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: AirGap's... one way protection Jon Squire (Oct 18)
- Re: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Joe Nall (Oct 19)
- Re: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Frederick M Avolio (Oct 19)
- Re: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Joe Nall (Oct 19)
- Re: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Frederick M Avolio (Oct 20)
- Re: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Joe Nall (Oct 20)
- Re: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Frederick M Avolio (Oct 23)
- Re: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Frederick M Avolio (Oct 19)
- Re: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Joe Nall (Oct 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Harris, Tim (Oct 19)
- RE: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Frederick M Avolio (Oct 23)
- RE: Re: AirGap's... one way protection Harris, Tim (Oct 23)