Re: Multi-media friendly Firewalls

[ark () eltex ru]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nuqneH,

PIX definitely does that, though i don't know if it really does it secure
way. Anybody here familliar with PIX internals? I'd like to know.
TIS Gauntlet does RA (as most firewalls do), PNA only, no RTSP. Yoy can
install rtspd on it, though, There were some rumours about H.323 proxy
but i haven't seen it.

H.323 is damn ugly thing. RA is better (a bit) but i think there could be
some security problems too.

ReedD () HQISEC ARMY MIL said :

> I have a customer that will be standing up a new group and is looking at
> implementing a firewall (yea !!).  However, they do have a strong
> requirement to support VTC capability (H.323, T.120) streaming video,
> real-audio and the like.  Luckily there are definite end-points external and
> internal to the firewall that will be used to create the firewall rule sets.
> What I need to know are what firewalls (proxy and stateful) that are
> multi-media friendly and can handle these protocols with the least amount of
> difficulty.  If anyone has any experiences good or bad using mutli-media
> protocols with the Cisco PIX, Lucent Brick, Axent Raptor (NT or UNIX), TIS
> Gauntlet would be appreciated.
>
> Don Reed

                                    _     _  _  _  _      _  _
 {::} {::} {::}  CU in Hell          _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##)        /Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||]            Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOJayEKH/mIJW9LeBAQGSSAP8DwZuFYBxl6LtWt5/eXlvRE3kLrgQsbpf
RQ9cFZQS2eq0eaXsEMpcDnOtFwtGCZS3nSVTtX5Iedxjr1MC+nWHRU62xrSwjphG
wwe31q9WqyHY8ujPqr9/c4HhM0uT9TKdaVlvRqg4DpaxsydZh/npgPqXoyOPGi1q
OYel8i10jq0=
=hMAJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----