Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Recent Attacks
From: Lance Spitzner <lance () ksni net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:24:06 -0600 (CST)
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Starkey, Kyle wrote:
I don't believe that this was the total objective. I believe (and this is only conjecture) that their point was the actual vulnerability itself. The DoS and the newly created DDos attacks are VERY simple to use and widely available. I think the point was "Hey, check out this great piece of code that is really easy to use and the MAJOR players on the internet are still vulnerable." I am hopeing it was more of a wake up call than it was malicious, but who knows.
I like to think that these attacks are one of the best things to ever happen to security. No one was really hurt (i.e. no lives were lost and everyone is still in business), and security now has everyone's attention (including the President). This was a desperately needed wake up call. Most of us in the security field were aware of these issues, but few were listening. Now, hopefully, this will help people focus on security and the issues involved. Unfortunately, media events like this are quickly forgotten :( Lance Spitzner http://www.enteract.com/~lspitz/papers.html
Current thread:
- Re: Recent Attacks, (continued)
- Re: Recent Attacks Michael Cassidy (Feb 23)
- Re: Recent Attacks Paul D. Robertson (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks Darren Reed (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks Paul D. Robertson (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks Philip J. Koenig (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Recent Attacks David LeBlanc (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks Barrett G. Lyon (Feb 17)
- RE: Recent Attacks Stephen Seal (Feb 17)
- RE: Recent Attacks Lance Spitzner (Feb 17)
- Re: Recent Attacks Frank L. Heidt (Feb 17)
- Re: Recent Attacks Iván Arce (Feb 17)
- Re: Recent Attacks Paul D. Robertson (Feb 19)
- Re: Recent Attacks Philip J. Koenig (Feb 17)
- Re: Recent Attacks Iván Arce (Feb 17)
- Re: Recent Attacks sedwards (Feb 19)