Re: CA/RA packages for SSL and IPSEC

[Vin McLellan <vin () shore net>]

        Hi Kelly,

        I,  and probably others, would much appreciate further information
on your evaluations.   Consider posting more about your criteria and how the
various alternatives rated against it?

        _Vin 


At 01:09 PM 9/9/99 -0700, Kelly D. Lucas wrote:
> I'm not sure how they structure their licensing, but Netscape CMS 4.1
> was just released, and it looks good.  I've done evals on most all of
> the major CA's, and Netscape's and Baltimore Technologies look like
> the best.
>
> kdl
>
>
>
> Wozz wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> >   I'm curious as to people's experience with the various Certificate
Authority
> >   packages available.  One thing I've noticed is that most of these packages
> >   require you to buy a license which includes a certain number of certs, and
> >   then you have to pay-per-cert after that number.  This strikes me as
kind of
> >   silly.  Does anyone know of any good commercial packages that don't
structure
> >   their licensing in this way, or a public domain package (not openssl by
> >   itself please, need some sort of web interface) which can issue SSL cert's
> >   and IPSEC certs and supports CEP for Cisco IPSEC.
> >
> >   Thanks!
>
> -- 
> Kelly D. Lucas            |  Kroll-O'Gara
> Security Consultant       |  Information Security Group
> kdl () securify com          |  650-812-9400 x 117
> "Any opinions that I state are my own, and not Kroll-O'Gara's"