Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: FW: BlackIce Defender???


From: ark () eltex ru
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:45:28 +0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nuqneH,

I don't think active defense (this way at least) is a good idea. 
Yep, it sounds cool and looks like advanced technology ;) but imho 
it adds little to security and opens many new DoS possibilities.

"Craig H. Rowland" <crowland () psionic com> said :


Point taken. I think there's something really smart about combining a port
listener with a personal firewall. Maybe it's too geeky for the masses, but
I like the notion of combining the otherwise silent protection of port
blocking with the feedback of a port listener. If Black Ice did the right
thing with the GUI, it may well be a winner.

Try out one of my tools: PortSentry

http://www.psionic.com/abacus/portsentry

It's a Unix only port listener and active defense systems. When it detects
a scan it blocks the host and reports the problem. No fuss, no problems,
and no charge (because it's free).
 

                                     _     _  _  _  _      _  _
 {::} {::} {::}  CU in Hell          _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##)        /Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||]            Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOBlepaH/mIJW9LeBAQGFowP/buULr0rH0dQc8sDnwBV1Xca4eLmlPage
pxtt9h4EYTmuNvSWLksKU6i7Kv+KHHwoR4ZD2zCLP8keySVs8vUtxMMu9+m54w70
o3fdihrK8dYT7atfmk295ozAgJt9sJuFtFP9Tjn5eDC6dTYdzy2lt4BlXlfaQ1wv
Ro2tF8olPOo=
=Lao2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Current thread: