Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Network Security Scanning
From: Adam Shostack <adam () homeport org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:53:52 -0400
Gosh, I hope not. The folks I know at Securify are much more into protecting interesting information than trying to hide IP addresses. If they got into that sort of obscurity without cause, my respect for them would plummet. Adam On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 05:28:38AM -0700, Chris St.Clair wrote: | >Our company has a staff of around 40 Network Security Consultants to | >perform just about any security audits, evaluations, etc. | > | | Would any of them consider it bad practice to advertise your | internal IP scheme in your e-mail headers? | | >Received: from unknown(10.5.63.6) by relay.veriguard.com via smap >(4.1)id | >xma000908; Tue, 29 Jun 99 16:02:18 -0700 | >Received: from securify.com (psyche.securify.com [10.5.63.231])by | > >dude.veriguard.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA32647for | > ><firewall-wizards () nfr net>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:47:12 -0700 | | | ______________________________________________________ | Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume
Current thread:
- Re: Network Security Scanning Chris St.Clair (Jul 02)
- Re: Network Security Scanning Adam Shostack (Jul 05)
- Re: Network Security Scanning Matt Doughty (Jul 06)
- Re: Network Security Scanning Adam Shostack (Jul 06)
- Re: Network Security Scanning Matt Doughty (Jul 06)
- Re: Network Security Scanning Patrick Oonk (Jul 05)
- Re: Network Security Scanning Adam Shostack (Jul 05)