Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware
From: Bennett Todd <bet () mordor net>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 10:34:46 -0400
Automated software scanners are useful tools for scanning many machines. If all you're interested in is a single machine, you can look at it by hand quicker than you can configure an automated scanner, and do a more thorough job. But if you want to check up on hundreds or thousands of hosts, an automated scanner is a must. An automated scanner is therefore good for raising the overall security of all the machines on a large network, up above some low baseline threshhold. If you get the very best security scanner, that baseline may even be slightly above the level hit by automated burglarly tools currently in circulation --- though I wouldn't want to bet on it. -Bennett
Current thread:
- Penetration testing via shrinkware Stout, Bill (Sep 03)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Bennett Todd (Sep 03)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Sheila //or// Bob (depends on who's writing) (Sep 06)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Stephen P. Berry (Sep 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 03)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware emaiwald (Sep 03)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Dominique Brezinski (Sep 03)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Ryan Russell (Sep 03)
- RE: Penetration testing via shrinkware Gary Crumrine (Sep 03)
- RE: Penetration testing via shrinkware Christopher Nicholls (Sep 07)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware tqbf (Sep 17)
- Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware Crispin Cowan (Sep 18)
- RE: Penetration testing via shrinkware Christopher Nicholls (Sep 07)