Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: future of IDS
From: Darren Reed <darrenr () reed wattle id au>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 08:48:05 +1000 (EST)
In some email I received from Doug Hughes, sie wrote:
Darren Reed writes:Something which just occurred to me, switches are `meant' to be able to switch such that full speed communications are kept between any two nodes on the switch without taking bandwidth away from other pairs. If you have a switch with 24 ports for 100BaseT, can you then push 1.2Gb/s through it ? Or is that just the `gigabit' hubs ? The problem is, that if you have a single 100BaseT monitor port, either than throughput for the entire switch is 100BaseT (serious reduction in performance) or you lose packets on the monitor port.That's what the gigabit uplink ports are for. There may be vendors that let you funnel all your 100Mbit and dup it out a gig, but I'm not aware of them. But yes, the switch backplane better be capable of approaching 1.2Gb, and most of them are these days.
I have just one problem with this: how do I plug my PC into one of those gigabit uplink ports ? Also, I imagine that the protocol on those connectors is proprietry, so even if you could connect it, making sense of it would be the next trick. Darren
Current thread:
- RE: future of IDS, (continued)
- RE: future of IDS Jonathan Rozes (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS Joseph S. D. Yao (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS NetSurfer (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS cfb (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS Vern Paxson (Oct 16)
- Re: future of IDS Stephen P. Gibbons (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS Crispin Cowan (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Stephen P. Gibbons (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Stephen P. Gibbons (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS Darren Reed (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS Doug Hughes (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Darren Reed (Oct 28)
- Re: future of IDS Doug Hughes (Oct 28)
- RFC blitzkreig server dreamwvr (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Owen O'Connor (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS David Lang (Oct 23)