Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: future of IDS
From: Doug Hughes <Doug.Hughes () Eng Auburn EDU>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 08:56:02 -0500
In some email I received from Doug Hughes, sie wrote:2) With the reality of GB LAN networking nearing the mainstream, has anybody(switch vendor or other) speculated on having for example a 10/100MB switch that has a GB port that can spit out all traffic on all ports for monitoring? Would seem like an ideal solution for the security conscious.I believe that most switch vendors do this already. I know that both 3com and cisco support this on some if not all of their switches. You select a port and replicate the traffic on it out another port.I think you misread the question. He's asking if there is a port rated at 1GB/s+ which you can connect upto and receive _all_ the traffic. All the switches I've seen have standard 10/100BaseT ports which you can select to be the monitor ports.
In theory you should be able to do this with a 100Mbit switch with say a 1G uplink port. In practice, it looks like most switches let you choose 1 and only 1 port to mirror to another port for analysis.
*Maybe* if you had something like one of the 3Com stackable switches and rather than plug another switch in using their custom daisy chain cable you plugged in your monitor THEN you might get what he's asking about. HOWEVER, I don't know of anything that can run at that speed or do anything useful with data at anything close to that speed. If there is, someone please enlighten us.
Those matrix connections are like 8GB (FD). There is no machine that you can plug into one of those, even if 3com were willing to divulged how they do it (which I doubt - it gives them marketing edge in stackable arena)
*If* they are spitting out a copy of _all_ the traffic through a single port then they *must* slow the switch down so that the entire throughput is no longer in excess of 100MBit/sec and hence it is no longer a true gigabit-switch (so why pay all that money ?).
Well, that's just it. They only allow you to copy 1 port (in the case of 3com and I think cisco too). But, they do have 100Mbit switches with Gig uplinks (3300 for example). The backplane/matrix should be MORE than capable of handling it.. you're unlikely to have all ports at 100% capacity. The 3500, as another example (though more of a small datacenter switch), has like a 24Gb backplane or something obscene like that.. You'd need some mighty fine hardware to try to analyze that! (talking about taking a sip out of a firehose) -- ____________________________________________________________________________ Doug Hughes Engineering Network Services System/Net Admin Auburn University doug () eng auburn edu
Current thread:
- RE: future of IDS, (continued)
- RE: future of IDS Choi, Byoung (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS Dex Wycoff (Oct 19)
- RFC blitzkreig server dreamwvr (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Vern Paxson (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS Owen O'Connor (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Vern Paxson (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS David Lang (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Ken Hardy (Oct 27)
- Re: future of IDS David Lang (Oct 23)
- RE: future of IDS Doug Hughes (Oct 19)
- Re: future of IDS Darren Reed (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Doug Hughes (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Darren Reed (Oct 23)
- RE: future of IDS Brock, Todd (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS andrew . stewart (Oct 23)
- Re: future of IDS Vern Paxson (Oct 28)
- Re: future of IDS Ryan Russell (Oct 29)
- Re: future of IDS Ryan Russell (Oct 29)
- RE: future of IDS Peter Vanderborght (Oct 29)