Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Reactive Firewalls
From: Darren Reed <darrenr () cyber com au>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 09:38:45 +1100 (EST)
In some mail I received from Stout, William, sie wrote
I agree to the extent that I seriously question firewalls that shutdown during a perceived attack. I agree that reactive firewalls can be dangerous, a hacker/cracker finds out what a target responds to, then manipulates the target by its' reactions. A reactive firewall makes a great D.O.S. target.
Whilst feedback may help the hacker, if it shuts down and needs to be manually rebooted, it also slows down the attack considerably. There's also a good chance it will discourage those who are 'trolling' for insecure sites/firewalls from making a serious attempt to penetrate your firewall. Personally, I'd prefer a service that fell victim to D.O.S attacks than one which could be compromised. Darren
Current thread:
- RE: Reactive Firewalls Stout, William (Feb 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Reactive Firewalls tqbf (Feb 11)
- Re: Reactive Firewalls Darren Reed (Feb 11)
- Re: Reactive Firewalls John Lines (Feb 12)
- Re: Reactive Firewalls Rick Smith (Feb 12)
- Re: Reactive Firewalls Chris Brenton (Feb 13)
- Re: Reactive Firewalls Rick Smith (Feb 13)
- Re: Reactive Firewalls Joseph S. D. Yao (Feb 13)
- Re: Reactive Firewalls Rachel Rosencrantz (Feb 13)
- Re: Reactive Firewalls Rick Smith (Feb 16)