Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: encapsulated protocols?
From: "Larry J. Hughes Jr." <larry () nwnet net>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 17:41:43 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Adam Shostack wrote:
Checkpoint has 50% of the market, and they see a much larger customer demand for NT based firewalls. I see NT as not yet ready for prime time in the security domain.)
Actually, Raptor has a larger market share than Checkpoint on the NT side of the house, which is where all of the volume is these days. Furthermore, NT as "not yet ready for prime time" is really an academic point, since at the end of the day, the customer rules. As of today, 80% of our firewall customers prefer NT as a firewall base. I'll reserve my comments on that in this public forum. --- Larry J. Hughes Jr. larry () nwnet net http://www.nwnet.net/~larry/
Current thread:
- IPsec and firewalls, (continued)
- IPsec and firewalls Aleph One (Feb 07)
- Re: IPsec and firewalls carson (Feb 09)
- Re: IPsec and firewalls Aleph One (Feb 09)
- Re: IPsec and firewalls carson (Feb 09)
- Re: IPsec and firewalls Adam Shostack (Feb 09)
- Re: IPsec and firewalls carson (Feb 09)
- Effect of full disk on logging under FW-1 v 2.1? Bret Watson (Feb 09)
- Re: IPsec and firewalls Ted Doty (Feb 09)
- Re: encapsulated protocols? Aleph One (Feb 07)
- Re: encapsulated protocols? Adam Shostack (Feb 07)
- Re: encapsulated protocols? Larry J. Hughes Jr. (Feb 09)
- Re: encapsulated protocols? Jeromie Jackson (Feb 07)
- Re: encapsulated protocols? Marcus J. Ranum (Feb 09)