Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: meaning of "both" in a filter statement
From: "Joseph S. D. Yao" <jsdy () cospo osis gov>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 17:29:43 -0400 (EDT)
Has anyone found an explanation for what "both" really does.?Hal, The distinction is between "can" and "may". Obviously, the IP "can" not go either way. But the file is saying that it "may". Hu?
I can kick my kids [physically capable]. I may not [not permissible]. The connection from the firewall to a specific IP address can only go through one of the N (N >= 2) interfaces. But the file is saying that, whichever of those interfaces allows that connection, the connection MAY [is allowed to be] made. The file only gives permissions. It does not speak to physical capabilities or connection realities.
This makes much more sense when using rules with wild cards. E.g., deny e-mail in or out to and from all IP addresses on "both" interfaces, or allow Quake in and out to and from all IP addresses on "both" interfaces. ;-} Capish? An unusual use and maybe spurious Capisci?
The specific examples, yes. The form, absolutely not. As a more specific use, if I want to have 'ping's or MTU discovery go through the firewall transparently, I may need to enable those ICMP services to/from all IP addresses on "both" interfaces. -- Joe Yao jsdy () cospo osis gov - Joseph S. D. Yao COSPO Computer Support EMT-A/B ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.
Current thread:
- Re: meaning of "both" in a filter statement Joseph S. D. Yao (Aug 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: meaning of "both" in a filter statement john madincea (Aug 02)
- Re: meaning of "both" in a filter statement Joseph S. D. Yao (Aug 02)