Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080
From: Gigi Sullivan <sullivan () seclab com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 15:55:42 +0200 (CEST)
Hi there :) Well, the SOCKS server listen on port 1080. I dunno if there are some kind of vulnerability, but it seems that someone tryed to see if you have a SOCKS server to connect to, IMHO. Bye -- gg sullivan -- Lorenzo Cavallaro Intesis SECURITY LAB Phone: +39-2-671563.1 Via Settembrini, 35 Fax: +39-2-66981953 I-20124 Milano ITALY Email: sullivan () seclab com On Fri, 14 Aug 1998, Roger Marquis wrote:
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 21:43:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis <marquis () roble com> To: firewall-wizards () nfr net Subject: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Has anyone heard of vulnerabilities on ports 1080 or 1090? These look like straight scans otherwise. Roger Marquis Roble Systems Consulting http://www.roble.com/Aug 13 04:40:37 local0 13 deny: TCP from 207.139.170.105.16028 to 205.7.40.2.1080 seq 626CE99, ack 0x0, win 512, SYN Aug 13 04:40:37 local1 /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.21:1080 from 207.139.170.105:16348 Aug 13 04:40:37 local1 /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.26:1080 from 207.139.170.105:16448 Aug 13 04:40:37 local1 /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.32:1080 from 207.139.170.105:16973 Aug 13 04:40:37 local1 /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.33:1080 from 207.139.170.105:17008 Aug 13 04:40:37 local1 /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.34:1080 from 207.139.170.105:17009 Aug 13 04:40:37 local1 /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.35:1080 from 207.139.170.105:17022 Aug 13 04:40:37 local1 /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.41:1080 from 207.139.170.105:17218 Aug 13 04:40:39 local1 /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.255:1080 from 207.139.170.105:20991 Aug 14 21:17:54 local0 13 deny: TCP from 24.128.144.110.18556 to 205.7.40.2.1090 seq DFDFBE08, ack 0x0, win 512, SYN Aug 14 21:17:55 local /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.21:1090 from 24.128.144.110:18627 Aug 14 21:17:55 local /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.26:1090 from 24.128.144.110:18769 Aug 14 21:17:55 local /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.61:1090 from 24.128.144.110:19383 Aug 14 21:17:55 local /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.52:1090 from 24.128.144.110:19363 Aug 14 21:19:49 local3 /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.63:1090 from 24.128.144.110:19474 Aug 14 21:17:55 local /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.53:1090 from 24.128.144.110:19375 Aug 14 21:17:55 local /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.54:1090 from 24.128.144.110:19376 Aug 14 21:17:55 local /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 205.7.40.55:1090 from 24.128.144.110:19377
Current thread:
- Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Roger Marquis (Aug 16)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Massimo Brogioni (Aug 17)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Gigi Sullivan (Aug 17)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Zach Brown (Aug 19)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Daniel J. Gregor Jr. (Aug 17)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Erlend Midttun (Aug 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Vern Paxson (Aug 17)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Kinczli Zoltán (Aug 18)
- Re: Scans to ports 1090 and 1080 Rik Farrow (Aug 23)