Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Blocked URL Categories
From: Ruth Ginzberg <rginzberg () UWSA EDU>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:19:43 +0000
Ha! I have had this argument with XaaS vendors on various occasions. I have a prefabricated essay I send them (modified slightly for your purpose): For any evil you can name, there’s probably a faculty member somewhere doing research on it and/or teaching about it in their classes. Some things that come to mind are legal and social science scholarship on pornography, political science and law enforcement scholarship about terrorism, fine arts classes that teach nude drawing and/or photography, computer science scholarship on malware, etc., etc. (I could go on…). The unifying point here is academic freedom. Basically, we have to be ever vigilant not to suppress it. Students need to be able to pursue scholarship inspired by the readings and the instructors they encounter. It is of utmost importance that higher education institutions, not legislative auditors, retain the right to determine on a case by case basis what is and is not legitimate scholarship at institutions of higher education. Ruth Ginzberg 608-890-3961 From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Ronald King Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 11:57 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: [SECURITY] Blocked URL Categories Good afternoon, We are a public institution in Maryland. We are being questioned by our state auditors as to why we permit access to the URL categories abused-drugs, extremism, hacking, and gambling when our AUP states IT resources are not to be used for illegal activities or "for commercial, religious, political (including activities supporting the nomination of any person for political office or attempting to influence the vote in any election or referendum), solicitation, or profit-making purposes." Along with academic freedom, the perspective I have been arguing is one to permit access to the sites. The argument is, just because a student accesses a gambling website does not mean they are gambling. So, my questions to the group are: · Do you block these URL categories by default? · If so, how do you address the request to research in areas that might require access to these URLs? · How did you convince the auditors it was necessary to allow access to these categories? As always, responses can be addressed directly to me or via the listserv. Thank you for your input! Ronald A. King, CISSP Chief Information Security Officer Morgan State University Office: (443) 885-3372 1700 E. Cold Spring Ln. Email: ronald.king () morgan edu<mailto:ronald.king () morgan edu> Baltimore, MD 21251 URL: http://www.morgan.edu Growing the future ... Leading the world<http://www.morgan.edu/Documents/ABOUT/StrategicPlan/StrategicPlan2011-21_Final.pdf>
Current thread:
- Blocked URL Categories Ronald King (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories John Ruggirello (Oct 27)
- Re: [External] [SECURITY] Blocked URL Categories Reyor, William F. (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Ruth Ginzberg (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Jones, Mark B (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Adam Maynard (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Bradley, Stephen (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Ladwig, John M (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Garrett Hildebrand (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Mccormick, Kevin (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Ruth Ginzberg (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Ronald King (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Frank Barton (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Babak Oskouian (Oct 27)
- Re: Blocked URL Categories Ronald King (Oct 27)