Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Checkpoint Vs. Palo Alto Vs. Fortinet
From: Kevin Robert Hayes <krhayes () WAYNE EDU>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:06:02 -0500
Allan, Earlier this year we went thru a bake-off and RFP process for replacing our Internet firewalls. I'm certain that the vendors hated going thru the 144-point evaluation, but it made a clear and level playing field. We selected Palo Alto from our responding manufacturers (Cisco, Juniper, Dell, HP, Fortinet) and have been *extremely* satisfied with the featureset, functionality, and performance of the device. Kevin Hayes, CISSP Information Security Officer Computing & Information Technology Wayne State University 313-577-3454 krhayes () wayne edu ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allan Nelson" <allan.nelson () UTT EDU TT> To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 6:05:38 PM Subject: [SECURITY] Checkpoint Vs. Palo Alto Vs. Fortinet Hello: My institution is currently reviewing its firewall strategy with the aim of upgrading/replacing our current firewall infrastructure. We are currently a Checkpoint shop, with devices providing both Advanced Networking and firewalling (UTM) capabilities. We recently met with reps from Palo Alto and Fortinet and on the surface they both seem to provide viable, possibly even cheaper alternatives. I just wanted to hear from the group of any experiences with Palo Alto and/or Fortinet to help us in our decision making. We currently have a combination of CP 9075s, 5075s and 576s deployed at our main and satellite campuses. Thanks Allan Nelson Manager, Security and Governance University of Trinidad and Tobago Help save paper! Do you really need to print this email? This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the recipient/s to whom it is addressed and may contain material that is PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL. It is the property of UTT in which all rights are reserved except where otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, reproduction, distribution of, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this e-mail is STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail and delete all copies thereof. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Neither the sender nor UTT accepts any liability for damage of any kind resulting from risks which are inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
Current thread:
- Checkpoint Vs. Palo Alto Vs. Fortinet Allan Nelson (Nov 01)
- Re: Checkpoint Vs. Palo Alto Vs. Fortinet Nathaniel Hall (Nov 01)
- Re: Checkpoint Vs. Palo Alto Vs. Fortinet Roger A Safian (Nov 04)
- Re: Checkpoint Vs. Palo Alto Vs. Fortinet Kevin Robert Hayes (Nov 04)
- Re: Checkpoint Vs. Palo Alto Vs. Fortinet Bradley, Stephen (Nov 04)
- Re: Checkpoint Vs. Palo Alto Vs. Fortinet Brian Helman (Nov 07)
- Re: Checkpoint Vs. Palo Alto Vs. Fortinet Bradley, Stephen (Nov 04)