Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice


From: Drew Perry <aperry () MURRAYSTATE EDU>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:22:05 -0600

Well, as of this morning, their corporate site is down. So it looks like
their groundbreaking method for guaranteed computer system security is to
turn them off. They may have a point.

Drew Perry
Security Analyst
Murray State University
(270) 809-4414
aperry () murraystate edu

*P*  Save a tree. Please consider the environment before printing this
message.



On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Hanson, Mike <mhanson () css edu> wrote:

Valerie and Rodney,

Why are non .edu people allowed to post on this forum and threaten legal
action?

 What is the value of this forum if it is not the free exchange of
information between .edu's?

Members are asking for and seeking advice on particular products and
implementations. Now we have to worry about whether or not a particular
vendor is listening and will seek legal recourse based on an opinion
expressed?


Mike Hanson
Network Security Manager
The College of St. Scholastica
Duluth, MN 55811








On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:42 AM, SCHALIP, MICHAEL <mschalip () cnm edu> wrote:

Hey Educause…..any thoughts here?  ****

** **

We come on this discussion group for the free exchange of ideas – and
THIS is allowed!?****

** **

Wow…..****

** **

*From:* Dennis Meharchand [mailto:dennis () valtx com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:25 PM
*To:* SCHALIP, MICHAEL
*Subject:* RE: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice****

** **

Michael,****

** **

I think your response was bad form.****

I am instructing my lawyers to file the first patent infringement lawsuit
against CNM.****

** **

Let’s see how much of a bad publicity stunt this is.****

** **

Dennis Meharchand****

CEO, Valt.X Technologies Inc.****

Cell: 416-618-4622****

Email: dennis () valtx com****

Web: www.valtx.com ****

** **

*From:* The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] *On Behalf Of *SCHALIP, MICHAEL
*Sent:* December 7, 2011 9:34 AM
*To:* SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
*Subject:* [Possible Spam] Re: [SECURITY] Deepfreeze on vm's?****

** **

Bad form…..scare tactics…..bad publicity stunt…..how do we get the
Educause moderator involved??****

** **

*From:* The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] *On Behalf Of *Walter Moore
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 07, 2011 6:54 AM
*To:* SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
*Subject:* Re: [SECURITY] Deepfreeze on vm's?****

** **

You had it right in your first paragraph. Whatever the merits of your
patent case (and you will have to forgive my skepticism) you have no
business interjecting it into this discussion.****

** **

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Dennis Meharchand <dennis () valtx com>
wrote:****

This is likely one of those situations where I should just continue to
shut my mouth until we are already to act but here goes:****

 ****

My company Valt.X Technologies owns the patents in this area and we
intend to enforce our patents in 2012.****

Here’s my advice – if you are using Deep Freeze or any VDI - include in
your contract that they cover you for Patent Infringement.****

 ****

Valt.X has just won its first public tender in Canada – we own this area
and intend to enforce our intellectual property rights.****

 ****

Our position is that Deep Freeze is a blatant copy of Valt.X issued
patents and that VDI also infringes our patents – we intend to sue all
infringers.****

 ****

Dennis Meharchand****

CEO, Valt.X Technologies Inc.****

Cell: 416-618-4622****

Email: dennis () valtx com****

Web: www.valtx.com ****

 ****

*From:* The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] *On Behalf Of *Brandon Payne
*Sent:* December 6, 2011 6:01 PM
*To:* SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
*Subject:* [SECURITY] Deepfreeze on vm's?****

 ****

We are looking into VDI for all our computer labs. VMware View to be
exact with WYSE P20 Zero Clients. Roughly about 300 or more vm's for all
the labs.****

 ****

From a virtual standpoint - do you see the need for Faronics Deepfreeze
on all computer lab vm's? Currently we are using Deepfreeze on our desktops
in all labs and has worked out great. For this situation, I'm not
interested in the security implications of why Deepfreeze is bad, just if
its recommended in a virtual environment.  ****

 ****

What are you doing in situations if a user profile gets hosed up with
malware in this vm enviroment?****


--
Brandon Payne
Technical Support Specialist
Information Services
Sauk Valley Community College****



****

** **

--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
Walter R. Moore --  Sr. Systems Administrator, Eckerd College
moorewr () eckerd edu --  http://home.eckerd.edu/~moorewr

"It was glorious to see -- if your heart were iron,
And you could keep from grieving at all the pain" - The Iliad (13.355)

I'm on twitter: http://twitter.com/moorewreckerd

***Reminder! ITS will never ask you to e-mail your password!*******


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
is
believed to be clean. ****


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
is
believed to be clean. ****


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
is
believed to be clean. ****

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
is
believed to be clean.




Current thread: