Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Federal Rules of Evidence
From: "Semmens, Theresa" <theresa.semmens () NDSU EDU>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 07:31:59 -0700
Kevin, I am a member of the EDUCAUSE TOPS work group. Would you be willing to write up a procedure to publish on the wiki? Theresa Semmens, CISA NDSU Chief Information Technology Security Officer NDSU Dept. 4510 210D IACC, PO Box 6050 Fargo, ND 58108-6050 Office: 701-231-5870 Cell: 701-+212-2064 Theresa.Semmens () ndsu edu<mailto:Theresa.Semmens () ndsu edu> www.ndsu.edu/its/security<http://www.ndsu.edu/its/security> From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:19 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence Daniel: We have a pretty comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure manual (SOP) that contains portions of what you are looking for but most likely not in a format that you might have in mind. I can send you - and anyone else - a copy of the Investigations section if you want. Just let me know. Being an X-Fed and then state detective I think it covers chain of custody fairly well. I can also send you our department retention schedule that covers active/inactive case retention limits. - Kevin Kevin L. McLaughlin, CISM, CISSP, GIAC-GSLC, CRISC, PMP, ITIL Master Certified Assistant Vice President, Information Security & Special Projects University of Cincinnati 513-556-9177 The University of Cincinnati is one of America's top public research institutions and the region's largest employer, with a student population of more than 41,000. [cid:image001.gif@01CC6953.2A383330] From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU]<mailto:[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU]> On Behalf Of Bradley, Stephen W. Mr. Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:24 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU> Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence I too would be interested in your findings. thx steve From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () listserv educause edu]<mailto:[mailto:SECURITY () listserv educause edu]> On Behalf Of Mark Reboli Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:22 AM To: SECURITY () listserv educause edu<mailto:SECURITY () listserv educause edu> Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence daniel we do not have this in place but i would be very interested if you could share your results. i would add a checklist would be great as well to ensure no step is missed. m Mark Reboli Network/Telecom/IT security Manager Misericordia University 570-674-6753 From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU]<mailto:[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU]> On Behalf Of Daniel Bennett Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:09 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU> Subject: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence Hello All, I am wondering if anyone has developed guidelines, policy, or procedures that you follow for every IT investigation? This would cover chain of custody, line of authorities, retention of information, report formats, etc. I am looking to standardize all investigations so if an internal investigation ever becomes civil or criminal all evidence will hold up. Please reply on or off list. Thanks, Daniel Bennett IT Security Analyst Vice-Chair North Central PA Members Alliance Pennsylvania College of Technology One College Ave Williamsport, PA 17701 P:570.329.4989 E:dbennett () pct edu
Current thread:
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence, (continued)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Rick Baker (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Niranjan Davray (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mark Reboli (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Matt Marmet (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Ewing, Ashley (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Christopher Jones (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Katsuya Uchida (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence King, Ronald A. (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Jeff Paynter (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Kenneth Fisher (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Semmens, Theresa (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Ullman, Catherine (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Carson, Larry (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Gene Spafford (Sep 05)
- Everyone - I will be posting the SOP on Federal Rules of Evidence Early next week to the list Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Ambrosi, Thomas (Sep 06)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Indir Avdagic (Sep 06)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Matthew Junod (Sep 07)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Bliven, Gary B. (Sep 07)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Walter Petruska (Sep 07)