Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Federal Rules of Evidence
From: David Wagenknecht <davew () YCP EDU>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:16:51 -0400
I like a copy as well. Thanks. On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) < mclaugkl () ucmail uc edu> wrote:
Daniel:**** We have a pretty comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure manual (SOP) that contains portions of what you are looking for but most likely not in a format that you might have in mind. I can send you – and anyone else – a copy of the Investigations section if you want. Just let me know. Being an X-Fed and then state detective I think it covers chain of custody fairly well. I can also send you our department retention schedule that covers active/inactive case retention limits.**** ** ** - Kevin**** ** ** ** ** Kevin L. McLaughlin, CISM, CISSP, GIAC-GSLC, CRISC, PMP, ITIL Master Certified**** Assistant Vice President, Information Security & Special Projects**** University of Cincinnati**** 513-556-9177**** **** The University of Cincinnati is one of America's top public research institutions and the region's largest employer, with a student population of more than 41,000.**** ** ** [image: cid:image002.gif@01C879E9.E20A0EF0]**** ** ** *From:* The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] *On Behalf Of *Bradley, Stephen W. Mr. *Sent:* Friday, September 02, 2011 9:24 AM *To:* SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU *Subject:* Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence**** ** ** I too would be interested in your findings.**** ** ** thx **** steve **** *From:* The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: SECURITY () listserv educause edu] *On Behalf Of *Mark Reboli *Sent:* Friday, September 02, 2011 9:22 AM *To:* SECURITY () listserv educause edu *Subject:* Re: [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence**** ** ** daniel we do not have this in place but i would be very interested if you could share your results. i would add a checklist would be great as well to ensure no step is missed.**** ** ** m**** Mark Reboli**** Network/Telecom/IT security Manager**** Misericordia University**** 570-674-6753**** ** ** ** ** ** ** *From:* The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Bennett *Sent:* Friday, September 02, 2011 9:09 AM *To:* SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU *Subject:* [SECURITY] Federal Rules of Evidence**** ** ** Hello All,**** ** ** I am wondering if anyone has developed guidelines, policy, or procedures that you follow for every IT investigation? This would cover chain of custody, line of authorities, retention of information, report formats, etc. I am looking to standardize all investigations so if an internal investigation ever becomes civil or criminal all evidence will hold up.** ** ** ** Please reply on or off list.**** ** ** Thanks,**** ** ** Daniel Bennett**** *IT Security Analyst* *Vice-Chair North Central PA Members Alliance* * * Pennsylvania College of Technology**** One College Ave**** Williamsport, PA 17701**** ** ** P:570.329.4989**** E:dbennett () pct edu**** ** **
-- Dave Wagenknecht Sr. Systems Administrator Information Technology York College of Pennsylvania 441 Country Club Road York, PA 17403 e: davew () ycp edu v: 717-815-1542 This information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies.
Current thread:
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence, (continued)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Robert Lau (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Gary Flynn (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Kevin Wilcox (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Wayne S. Martin (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Lena Helmbrecht (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence James R. Pardonek (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Dave Koontz (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence James Farr '05 (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Ullman, Catherine (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Gary Flynn (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence David Wagenknecht (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Rick Baker (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Niranjan Davray (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mark Reboli (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Matt Marmet (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Ewing, Ashley (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Christopher Jones (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Katsuya Uchida (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence King, Ronald A. (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Jeff Paynter (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Kenneth Fisher (Sep 05)