Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Cenzic Hailstorm vs Rational AppScan from IBM
From: Jon Hanny <jehanny () GWU EDU>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:52:26 -0500
We bough Cenzic almost a year ago and thus far are happy with the product. Having said that, there really is no replacement for a well seasoned penetration tester. I did not try Appscan so I cannot speak to how they compare. Respectfully, Jon Hanny, CISSP Application Security Specialist The George Washington University 703-726-4469 jehanny () gwu edu appsec () gwu edu -----Original Message----- From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Erik Decker Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 1:23 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Cenzic Hailstorm vs Rational AppScan from IBM All, We are currently evaluating two web vulnerability scanning products: Cenzic Hailstrom and IBM's appscan. Has anyone ever used Hailstorm before? If so, do you like their product? Did you run a comparison against Appscan? Cenzic seems to be a new player to this market. Their product seems fairly robust, but we are a little unsure of it. Our team has used Appscan in the past, but we are open to change. Thanks! -- ---- Erik Decker Security Administrator Information Technology Services
Current thread:
- Cenzic Hailstorm vs Rational AppScan from IBM Erik Decker (Dec 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cenzic Hailstorm vs Rational AppScan from IBM Logan, Kim (loganks) (Dec 11)
- Re: Cenzic Hailstorm vs Rational AppScan from IBM Jon Hanny (Dec 11)
- Re: Cenzic Hailstorm vs Rational AppScan from IBM Neil Matatall (Dec 11)
- Re: Cenzic Hailstorm vs Rational AppScan from IBM David Auclair (Dec 11)