Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
<SPAM> Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting
From: "Crawford, Tim M." <tcrawford () GSB STANFORD EDU>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:03:06 -0700
I should have been clearer too. It is not that I am against having vendors on the list. However, there need to be "rules for engagement". Specifically, avoiding the cold call sales. If that can be addressed, I am ok with the approach. One other aspect would be sharing sensative information with other higher-ed folks vs vendors. Maybe that is a more sensative issue for some than others. Tim -------------------------- Sent via BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: Cal Frye <cjf () CALFRYE COM> To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU <SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU> Sent: Wed Apr 11 12:33:21 2007 Subject: Re: [SECURITY] OT: vendor contacts after list posting Paul Russell wrote:
On 4/11/2007 14:32, Sarah Stevens wrote:I realize that you may not appreciate the cold calling from vendors regarding their products and services. I can understand that this can become overwhelming. However, there is another perspective to look at here as well. I own an information security company....I'd like to believe that I provide a valuable service and that I can continue to participate on this listserv as a valuable asset instead of "vendor scum".Sarah described one of many ways that a vendor may choose to interact with other members of this type of forum. I, for one, have no problem with this approach. I have no problem with vendors who provide meaningful replies to specific questions. I have a problem with vendors who use my subscription on a 'security' list as justification to bombard me with marketing dreck about every 'security' product and service they are trying to sell this week.
Let me clarify my position; sorry I was too brief before. I'm with Paul in welcoming measured, useful interaction with vendor representatives on this list. The mosquito drone I referred to was strictly in reference to the uninvited ringing of my telephone in response to list postings. Both open and closed lists have their uses; I don't think the vendors participating on this list have caused me much trouble and have, indeed, contributed to the community. I'm not calling for any changes in list management. -- Regards, -- Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College www.calfrye.com, www.pitalabs.com "I have a total irreverence for anything connected with society except that which makes the roads safer, the beer stronger, the food cheaper and the old men and old women warmer in the winter and happier in the summer." --- Brendan Behan.
Current thread:
- <SPAM> Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Gary Flynn (Apr 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- <SPAM> Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Crawford, Tim M. (Apr 11)
- Re: <SPAM> Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Gary Flynn (Apr 11)
- Re: <SPAM> Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Crawford, Tim M. (Apr 11)
- <SPAM> Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Matthew Keller (Apr 16)
- <SPAM> Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Dennis Meharchand (Apr 16)