Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives


From: Cal Frye <cjf () CALFRYE COM>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:22:22 -0500

I've been able to download and install the latest image files on my 4500. I just
this moment had it update itself to 7.2.1g1. It's not automatic like Clean
Access, and that's for the best, IMHO. I don't see the obstacle you're seeing.

--Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College
   www.ouuf.org, www.calfrye.com
   Say Yes Twice for Oberlin Schools!   www.oberlinyesyes.com

  "I am not blaming those who are resolved to rule, only those who show an even
greater readiness to submit." --Thucydides.


Paul Younker wrote:
When you say manually update, do you mean researching and identifying
new types of traffic and manually creating rules? If so, I don't have
the staffing level to spend the time it would take to use the unit
manually. That was our initial plan after the discontinuation of
service, but it was proving to be a severe productivity drain on my
staff trying to keep up with new types of traffic.

Allot referred us to a VAR for the NetEnforcer. I can give you their
name off-list if you would like.

Paul Younker
Associate Director of Information Technology
Greenville College
Greenville, IL

618.664.7072
618.664.7172 fax
paul.younker () greenville edu

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up
where I intended to be. - Douglas Adams


-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Frye [mailto:cjf () CALFRYE COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:59 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper &
alternatives

You can manually update the 4500. We have an 8500 and a 4500, and both
are operating at version 7.01.g1. It's still doing what we need it to
do.

Where did you get your pricing for the Netenforcer? Our indications were
it was rather more than our Packetshapers.

--Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College
   www.ouuf.org, www.calfrye.com
   Say Yes Twice for Oberlin Schools!   www.oberlinyesyes.com

  "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire (1694-1778)


Paul Younker wrote:

We had a Packetshaper 4500 series running on our network for a little
more than 12 months. We didn't use it any longer than that because
Packeteer designated the product as end-of-life and discontinued the
software updates for the product. Without the software (and protocol
identification) updates, the product's usefulness is severely limited.
Our only option with Packeteer was to spend an additional significant
amount of money to upgrade to a 6500 unit a little over a year after
buying the 4500 unit.

We are now in the process of evaluating a demo (new) NetEnforcer.
Based upon the information we have received, it appears unlikely that
Allot will arbitrarily discontinue updates for the products they sell.


Our very initial impressions of the NetEnforcer are that it is
superior to the Packetshaper for a substantially smaller investment. I


will be extremely reluctant to purchase any products from Packeteer in


the future.

Paul Younker
Associate Director of Information Technology Greenville College
Greenville, IL

618.664.7072
618.664.7172 fax
paul.younker () greenville edu

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended
up where I intended to be. - Douglas Adams


-----Original Message-----
From: Gaddis, Jeremy L. [mailto:jlgaddis () IVYTECH EDU]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:44 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: [SECURITY] Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper &
alternatives

Hi,

I am interested in hearing opinions on Packeteer, Inc.'s PacketShaper
product as well as any opinions of competing devices.  I am looking to


perhaps deploy the Packeteer to shape outbound traffic and send some
of it to the bitbucket ("net radio", P2P, etc.).

Thanks,
-j

--
Jeremy L. Gaddis     <jlgaddis () ivytech edu>
Special Projects Manager
Computer & Technology Services
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
812.330.6156 (w)  812.797.6176 (m)





Current thread: