BreachExchange mailing list archives

Pharmacies: Watch Out for Future HHS Crackdowns on Security Rule Violations


From: Audrey McNeil <audrey () riskbasedsecurity com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 19:59:38 -0600

http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/pharmacies-watch-out-for-future-hhs-cra-08394/

As we all know by now, HIPAA1 required the Secretary of the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS) to adopt regulations protecting the
privacy of "protected health information" (PHI). HHS responded to that
requirement by adopting what are commonly known as the HIPAA Privacy Rule
and the HIPAA Security Rule.

The Privacy Rule, or Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable
Health Information, establishes national standards to protect the privacy
of PHI. The Security Rule, or Security Standards for the Protection of
Electronic Protected Health Information, protects a subset of information
protected by the Privacy Rule, which is all PHI held or transferred in
electronic form (e-PHI). The Security Rule does this by describing the
administrative, physical and technical safeguards necessary to ensure the
confidentiality, integrity and availability of e-PHI.

A 2009 law called the Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health (HITECH) requires, among other things, that HHS provide for
periodic audits of covered entities to check their compliance with HIPAA
requirements. The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has responsibility for
enforcing both the Privacy Rule and the Security Rule. In November 2013,
the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued a report finding that the
OCR was not meeting all federal requirements in its oversight and
enforcement of the Security Rule. In particular, the OIG found that OCR had
not complied with HITECH's requirement that it provide for periodic audits
of covered entities to ensure their compliance with the requirements of the
Security Rule.

Following the release of the OIG's findings, OCR audited a number of
covered entities and stepped up its HIPAA enforcement activities
significantly. Some of the OCR's activities since the OIG's release of its
report criticizing the OCR included settlements with various covered
entities for Security Rule violations. In two settlements that arose out of
the theft of unencrypted laptop computers containing e-PHI, the covered
entities were required to pay a total of $1,975,220 in fines for Security
Rule violations. In two other settlements arising out of a failure to
secure e-PHI on network computers, the covered entities were required to
pay a total of $4,800,000 in fines for Security Rule violations.

In June 2014, a chief regional counsel with the OCR warned covered entities
and their business associates to be ready for aggressive punishment by the
OCR, and he reportedly predicted that the $10 million in HIPAA fines levied
during the then-preceding 12-month period would be substantially less than
the HIPAA fines he expects the OCR to impose through June 2015.

Pharmacies are subject to the same HIPAA fines as any other HIPAA-covered
entity and rank fifth among HIPAA-covered entities that OCR requires to
take corrective action to comply with the Privacy and Security Rules. OCR
prepared a list of 1,200 companies for a new round of HIPAA audits that
began at the end of 2014 and have continued into 2015. Two-thirds of the
companies on the list are HIPAA-covered entities such as pharmacies and
nursing homes, and the balance are business associates – those
organizations that store or process PHI maintained by covered entities.
Audits conducted to check compliance with the Security Rule will focus on
compliance with the rule's administrative, physical and technical
safeguards. Fines for willful neglect violations not corrected within 30
days can be up to $50,000 per violation. Intentional violations or
violations that involve fraud are subject to more severe penalties,
including prison.

We can expect HHS to continue to surprise HIPAA-covered entities, including
pharmacies, with big-ticket penalties throughout 2015. Many of the
violations of HIPAA's Security Rule for which covered entities have been
sanctioned to date could easily have been avoided by (1) securing laptop
computers and other portable devices, and (2) performing a comprehensive
risk analysis of security management processes on an ongoing basis,
identifying the risks and implementing appropriate security measures.

To better protect your pharmacy operations from potential violations of
HIPAA's Security Rule, we recommend the following:

Appoint a trusted employee as your Security Official, responsible for
developing and implementing your security policies and procedures. That
appointment should be documented.
Have your Security Official review the six educational programs sponsored
by the OCR on compliance with Privacy and Security Rules. Of particular
relevance to complying with the Security Rule are the programs "Your Mobile
Device and Health Information Privacy and Security," and "Understanding the
Basics of HIPAA Security Risk Analysis and Risk Management." These programs
are available here.
Invest in available software to assist your Security Official with Security
Rule compliance.
Have your Security Official study the "Audit Program Protocol" here and
conduct a self-audit of your pharmacy's compliance with the Security Rule.
_______________________________________________
Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () datalossdb org)
Archived at http://seclists.org/dataloss/
Unsubscribe at http://lists.osvdb.org/mailman/listinfo/dataloss
For inquiries regarding use or licensing of data, e-mail
        sales () riskbasedsecurity com 

Supporters:

Risk Based Security (http://www.riskbasedsecurity.com/)
YourCISO is an affordable SaaS solution that provides a comprehensive information security program that ensures focus 
on the right security.  If you need security help or want to provide real risk reduction for your clients contact us!

Current thread: