EPA acknowledges releasing personal details on farmers, senator slams agency

[Erica Absetz <erica () riskbasedsecurity com>]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/09/epa-acknowledges-giving-out-personal-info-in-request-that-included-data-on/

The Environmental Protection Agency acknowledged Tuesday that it
released personal information on potentially thousands of farmers and
ranchers to environmental groups, following concerns from
congressional Republicans and agriculture groups that the release
could endanger their safety.

According to a document obtained by FoxNews.com, the EPA said “some of
the personal information that could have been protected … was
released." Though the EPA has already sent out the documents, the
agency now says it has since redacted sensitive details and asked the
environmental groups to “return the information.”

But Sen. John Thune, who originally complained about the release,
slammed the EPA for trying to retroactively recover the sensitive
data.

"It is inexcusable for the EPA to release the personal information of
American families and then call for it back, knowing full well that
the erroneously released information will never be fully returned," he
said in a statement to FoxNews.com. "While EPA acknowledging that it
erred is a first step, more must be done to protect the personal
information of our farmers and ranchers now and in the future. I will
continue to demand answers from the EPA on how this information was
collected and why it is still being distributed to extreme
environmental groups to the detriment of our farm and ranch families."

The information on livestock and produce farmers was sought through a
Freedom of Information Act request by the groups Earth Justice, the
Natural Resources Defense Council and the Pew Charitable Trust. They
were given information on roughly 80,000 farmers and ranchers.

Pew returned the original information, per the agency's request
Thursday, according to documents obtained by Fox.

The agency acknowledged the information included individual names,
email addresses, phone numbers and personal addresses.

Thune, of South Dakota, where 500 farmers and ranchers had their
information made public, sent a letter Monday to the EPA requesting
the agency answer a list of questions -- including whether agency
officials reviewed the information to see whether the release complied
with the federal Privacy Act of 1974.

“The EPA has threatened the health and safety of agriculture producers
and their families and has damaged the security of our food system,”
Thune said. “There is a growing gap of trust between America’s farm
and ranch families and the EPA. Much of this lack of trust is due to
EPA’s aggressive regulatory agenda.”

Other concerns expressed by Thune, farm bureaus and others include
whether the EPA first consulted with the departments of Agriculture
and Homeland Security, which had already advised against compiling a
public database with similar information and whether the EPA still
intends to create such a record.

“Does the EPA intend to gather any more personal information on
livestock producers?” Thune asked in his letter to agency Acting
Administrator Bob Perciasepe.

The EPA said the data was related to farms in 29 states with
“concentrated animal feeding operations” and that the released
information was part of the agency’s commitment to “ensure clean water
and public-health protection.”

The groups wanted the information, they say, because such large-scale
operations are a major source of water pollution and they want to hold
the EPA accountable for enforcing the Clean Water Act.

Critics have characterized Earth Justice and the organizations as
being “extremist groups” and say the released information included
data on family farmers who feed fewer than 1,000 animals, which
excludes them from having to comply with the Act.

“This information details my family’s home address,” J.D. Alexander, a
Nebraska cattle farmer and former president of the National
Cattlemen's Beef Association, told FarmFuture.com. “The only thing it
doesn’t do is chauffeur these extremists to my house.”

In response, Jon Devine, an attorney, wrote in a blog for the Natural
Resources Defense Council: "The most irresponsible charge made by NCBA
is that providing this information to public interest groups somehow
may facilitate criminal acts against facilities. That accusation is
entirely unwarranted. NRDC and Pew condemn such illegal activities."

The EPA said the majority of the data was already publicly available
through state databases, web sites and federal and state permits, or
is required to be released under federal or state law.

However, in response to privacy concerns raised by agricultural
groups, the agency redacted sections of information from 10 of the 29
states that contained some personal data, the release said.
_______________________________________________
Dataloss-discuss Mailing List (dataloss-discuss () datalossdb org)
Archived at http://seclists.org/dataloss/
Unsubscribe at http://datalossdb.org/mailing_list

Supporters:

Risk Based Security (http://www.riskbasedsecurity.com/)
Risk Based Security equips organizations with security intelligence, risk
management services and on-demand security solutions to establish
customized risk-based programs to address information security and
compliance challenges. 

Tenable Network Security (http://www.tenable.com/)
Tenable Network Security provides a suite of solutions which unify real-time
vulnerability, event and compliance monitoring into a single, role-based, interface
for administrators, auditors and risk managers to evaluate, communicate and
report needed information for effective decision making and systems management.