BreachExchange mailing list archives

Re: Do Breach Notification Laws Work?


From: bethg () privacyrights org
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:48:54 -0700 (PDT)

The journalist who wrote the story failed to mention that public interest
groups like ours, along with other nonprofits, DO pay attention to
information about breaches. We in turn are in touch with lawmakers,
regulators, and their staff members. Breach notices are not lost on us.
    The states with laws that require breached entities to notify a
central authority in their state have taken the best approach, in my
opinion. And best of all is when those state authorities post the info
on a web site.
Beth Givens
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse

breach notification letters as junk mail rather than acting to
protect their identity, experts say.
It's unfortunate that consumer behavior is so predictable. Over
exposure has lead to apathy in most cases. It's been an Achilles heel
for a lot of security initiatives: browser warnings, problematic
certificates, site redirection, etc. Users just click OK to keep
drilling on... Many do not even take the time to read the warning
message. Most who do read the warning do not understand it because
security folks and programmers are the author of the warning. Mom and
Grandpop have no idea of what is being said in most instances.

On 3/12/09, security curmudgeon <jericho () attrition org> wrote:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Richard Forno <rforno () infowarrior org>

Do Breach Notification Laws Work?
By Kim Zetter EmailMarch 09, 2009 | 9:00:00 AM

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/03/experts-debate.html

Consumers caught in a national epidemic of data spills are growing numb,
discarding breach notification letters as junk mail rather than acting
to
protect their identity, experts say.

And though most states now have laws requiring companies to warn breach
victims, some serious breaches are still showing up on customer credit
and
bank statements before any official warning has been issued. It all begs
the question: are the notification laws working?

This was the question that a number of speakers at the Security Breach
Notification seminar held in Berkeley on Friday (at right) tried to
answer.

When California passed the first data breach notification law in 2003,
it
quickly became the defacto standard for the rest of the country. A total
of 44 states now have breach notification laws, which vary only slightly
in their definitions of what constitutes a breach that requires
notification and what companies must do when they experience a breach.

It's clear that the laws have made the public more aware of breaches and
the vulnerability of their data, and have exposed poor security
practices
at many businesses. A 2005 study by the FBI showed that in the absence
of
a legal requirement to report breaches, only 20 percent of firms would
report serious breaches to law enforcement.

[..]
_______________________________________________
Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () datalossdb org)

CREDANT Technologies, a leader in data security, offers advanced data
encryption solutions.
Protect sensitive data on desktops, laptops, smartphones and USB sticks
transparently
across your enterprise to ensure regulatory compliance.
http://www.credant.com/stopdataloss

_______________________________________________
Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () datalossdb org)

CREDANT Technologies, a leader in data security, offers advanced data
encryption solutions.
Protect sensitive data on desktops, laptops, smartphones and USB sticks
transparently
across your enterprise to ensure regulatory compliance.
http://www.credant.com/stopdataloss



_______________________________________________
Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () datalossdb org)

CREDANT Technologies, a leader in data security, offers advanced data encryption solutions.
Protect sensitive data on desktops, laptops, smartphones and USB sticks transparently 
across your enterprise to ensure regulatory compliance.
http://www.credant.com/stopdataloss


Current thread: