BreachExchange mailing list archives

Re: [vanderaj () greebo net: SF new column announcement: Strict liability for data breaches?]

From: Chris Walsh <cwalsh () cwalsh org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:49:38 -0600

On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:35:45AM -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:


Sure.  Doesn't the standard of due care depend (in part) on
foreseeability?  Eg, a normal person should forsee that kids will come
play in their pool.  IANAL.


Unencrypted PII as an attractive nuisance?  I like!  I like!  >:^)

Chris

_______________________________________________
Dataloss mailing list
Dataloss () attrition org
https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/dataloss

Current thread:

[vanderaj () greebo net: SF new column announcement: Strict liability for data breaches?] Adam Shostack (Feb 20)
- Re: [vanderaj () greebo net: SF new column announcement: Strict liability for data breaches?] Mike Fratto (Feb 21)
  - Re: [vanderaj () greebo net: SF new column announcement: Strict liability for data breaches?] Adam Shostack (Feb 21)
    - Re: [vanderaj () greebo net: SF new column announcement: Strict liability for data breaches?] Chris Walsh (Feb 21)
    - Re: [vanderaj () greebo net: SF new column announcement: Strict liability for data breaches?] blitz (Feb 21)
    - Re: [vanderaj () greebo net: SF new column announcement: Strict liability for data breaches?] Doc (Feb 21)
    - Re: [vanderaj () greebo net: SF new column announcement: Strict liability for data breaches?] blitz (Feb 22)
  - Message not available
    - Re: [vanderaj () greebo net: SF new column announcement: Strict liability for data breaches?] blitz (Feb 21)