Re: Announcing metasm

["Thomas Ptacek" <tqbf () matasano com>]

I've learned not to benchmark ideas against MOSDEF; it's dispiriting.

The difference between my code and yours, apart from maturity and
originality, is that yours focuses on assembly language and mine
focuses on a class hierarchy for opcodes. I wanted to see how far I
could get using Python as a superficial IL for x86.

My goal isn't shellcode; it's process[or] manipulation. I used it to
write a debugger to run over firewire.

> Thomas Ptacek wrote:
> > We've had a lot of luck with a very similar approach. Ours is in
> > Python, only supports x86, and isn't as complete; it also tries
> > less hard to look like a DSL. But we like it. If anyone's
> > interested, we'd be happy to post.
> How do these things differ from MOSDEF (other than having a disassembler?)

-- 
---
Thomas H. Ptacek // matasano security
read us on the web: http://www.matasano.com/log
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave