Re: Hacker opsec case study

[Pete Herzog <lists () isecom org>]

I think this says more about the poor defensive technique of "patching" and 
reliance upon it than about the 0day itself.

-pete.


Dave Aitel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070419/ap_on_hi_te/hackers_state_department
>
> This is a great article from the perspective of "How long in the State
> dept. does one Word 0day buy you."
>
> It's like a hacker opsec case study.
>
> - -dave
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGJwA5tehAhL0gheoRAvbmAJ9YSgtu9fBKuJqoCkbrBWSeEbtIngCdEn/R
> YL/rw3zpGJS5FCY3h2/zW4A=
> =ydkC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dailydave mailing list
> Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
> http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave