Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: 0days
From: "Valery Marchuk" <tecklord () argocom cv ua>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:46:59 +0300
Sure http://www.securitylab.ru/poc/275330.php ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Aitel To: dailydave () lists immunitysec com Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 4:39 AM Subject: [Dailydave] 0days Someone's finally keying in on the value of 0days for penetration testing (or, ya know, hacking). Does anyone know where the PPT 2003 PoC was posted? -dave http://news.com.com/The+future+of+malware+Trojan+horses/2100-7349_3-6125453.html?tag=nefd.lede The future of malware The use of zero-day flaws circumvents traditional signature-based security products. These products rely on attack signatures (the "fingerprint" of the threat) to block the attack, which requires the attack to have been identified at least once before. "This is the future of malware attacks," said Andreas Marx, an antivirus software specialist at the University of Magdeburg in Germany. "People affected by this won't be protected by antivirus software because there is no signature." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave