Dailydave mailing list archives

Re: Commercial Fuzzers

From: Dave Aitel <dave () immunityinc com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:35:23 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

RaMatkal wrote:

Just wandering if anyone on this list has had any experience with a
commercial fuzzer such as beStorm
(http://www.beyondsecurity.com/BeStorm_Info.htm) and how it/they
compare to open source equivalents such as SPIKE....

RaMatkal


I think we all over the last week have gotten a bit of experience with
the ProtoVer fuzzer, which is probably a lot cheaper the the
commercial Protos, but clearly produces results. :> I like how there's
at least one mailing list left that allows a flood of 0day...

- -dave

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD8zwrB8JNm+PA+iURAjSRAKCvxK6K/jH/TdBgocHljMOM3TNJxQCePkLT
6egNI/FyUlKARGF6nEaJa2Q=
=rr0g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Current thread:

Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability Evgeny Legerov (Jan 31)
- Re: Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability KF (lists) (Jan 31)
  - Re: Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability Evgeny Legerov (Jan 31)
    - Re: Proof of concept for CommuniGate Pro Server vulnerability Dave Aitel (Feb 01)
    - Commercial Fuzzers RaMatkal (Feb 15)
    - Re: Commercial Fuzzers Dave Aitel (Feb 15)
    - Re: Commercial Fuzzers Matt Hargett (Feb 15)
    - Re: Commercial Fuzzers Gadi Evron (Feb 15)