Dailydave mailing list archives

Microsoft letdown day


From: Dave Aitel <dave () immunitysec com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:00:31 -0500

I'm both happy and sad when there are no good Microsoft bugs. On one hand it's good that none of your bugs got blown (phew!), and on the other hand you don't have anything fun to do that day."Remote" bugs in IE just don't have that spark since five of them come out a week.

One thing I've noticed is that it's now endemic that everyone agrees with DJB that client-side bugs like the ANI overflow are "remote bugs". This is crazy! I wonder if it's skewing any new "research" on "windows of vulnerability" or "The security of Linux versus Microsoft Windows". There are three simple classifications:
Local
Remote
Client-Side

An IE bug is not a remote bug. It's a client-side bug. I like how they claim there's "remote code execution." Is it making a DCOM call to a remote machine? :>

If the industry can't even get this sort of thing right, how do we expect it to do something hard, like protect my Sidekick from getting owned?

-dave
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave


Current thread: