Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: base64
From: Buck Huppmann <buckh () pobox com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:49:25 -0400
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 03:13:57PM -0400, MightyE wrote:
I agree, I don't think it's unreasonable to reject improperly formatted messages.
Take the low road catchall, and simply reject them as a matter of course.
this runs counter to the maxim of Postel <http://www.postel.org/postel.html>: "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- jon RFC-1122 (originates in RFC760) or was that wisdom for a different time? `"What would Jon have done?", we will think, as we wrestle in the days ahead with the problems Jon kept so well tamed for so many years.' --Vint Cerf RFC 2468
Current thread:
- Re: base64, (continued)
- Re: base64 Christian Vogel (Sep 25)
- Re: base64 Seth Breidbart (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 Alexander Ogol (Sep 23)
- Re: base64 Christian Vogel (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 David Wilson (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 der Mouse (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 Christian Vogel (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 Earl Hood (Sep 26)
- RE: base64 latte (Sep 23)
- Re: base64 Ilya Teterin (Sep 23)
- Re: base64 MightyE (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 Buck Huppmann (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 Andrew Church (Sep 25)
- Message not available
- Re: base64 MightyE (Sep 25)
- Re: base64 Bennett Todd (Sep 25)
- Re: base64 MightyE (Sep 25)
- Re: base64 Earl Hood (Sep 26)
- Re: base64 Bennett Todd (Sep 26)
- Re[2]: base64 3APA3A (Sep 26)
- RE: base64 Alun Jones (Sep 26)
- Re: base64 Bennett Todd (Sep 26)
- Re: base64 Buck Huppmann (Sep 24)