Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack.
From: ddowney () MAIL HISLINUXBOX NET
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 18:20:47 -0800
Actually there is one other thought I wanted to state before sending, so I'll state it now. Just because a problem can be worked around via some other solution, in this case a firewall, does not relieve venders from the obligation to fix something. Sure, they can use the interim solution to buy them time to actually FIX the problem, but NOT to escape the responsibility to fix it. -- David D.W. Downey - RHCE Consulting Engineer Ensim Corporation david.downey () ensim com
Current thread:
- Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. Woody (Mar 05)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. Elias Levy (Mar 05)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. Perry Harrington (Mar 05)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. ddowney (Mar 05)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. John Cronin (Mar 05)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. Ben Laurie (Mar 06)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. ddowney (Mar 05)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. Perry Harrington (Mar 05)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. Ben Laurie (Mar 06)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. Perry Harrington (Mar 06)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. Ben Laurie (Mar 06)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. Dan Harkless (Mar 06)
- Re: Loopback and multi-homed routing flaw in TCP/IP stack. MaD dUCK (Mar 05)