Bugtraq mailing list archives
CR vs. CoreBuilder
From: jnemeth () victoria tc ca (John Nemeth)
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 14:12:40 -0700
I have a 3Com CoreBuilder 3500 running software version 2.1.0 that has been falling over a lot over the last few days. I attached a terminal to the console port. One of the times when it fell over, I noticed a message about a problem with the HTTP server. So, I checked the configuration and sure enough I had disabled web access. Pointing a web browser at it, finds that the webserver is still active, it just always returns a page saying, "Web access denied". Talk about a stupid way of doing things! Telneting to port 80 and using HEAD gets the following info: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 05 Aug 1901 12:40:06 GMT Server: Agranat-EmWeb/R2_3 Content-Type: text/html Expires: Sat, 05 Aug 1901 12:40:06 GMT Last-Modified: Sat, 05 Aug 1901 12:40:06 GMT Cache-Control: no-cache Pragma: no-cache I'll upgrade it to the latest software version and see what happens; but, needless to say I'm thoroughly unimpressed with the way they have been doing things. NOTE: I don't have any proof that it is CodeRed that is causing the CoreBuilder to fall over, but it is highly likely.
Current thread:
- CR vs. CoreBuilder John Nemeth (Aug 05)
- Re: CR vs. CoreBuilder terry white (Aug 05)
- Re: CR vs. CoreBuilder randy (Aug 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CR vs. CoreBuilder cords (Aug 06)
- Re: CR vs. CoreBuilder terry white (Aug 05)