Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: BRU Vulnerability
From: twhite () ANIOTA COM (terry white)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 23:38:23 -0700
on "06/11/00" "Theo Van Dinter" writ: : On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 02:05:26PM -0700, Jeremy Rauch wrote: : > By default, BRU is installed setuid root. If it isn't, and is run by a : > non-root user, it complains: : > bru: [W171] warning - BRU must be owned by root and have suid bit set : : Clarification request: Which version of BRU? I got the RPM version of : BRU 2000 (v15 I believe) w/ a RedHat box set I bought one day: ... really. i checked, and both of my installed BRU's failed to indicate suid ... -- ... i'm a man , and i can change , if i really have to , i guess ...
Current thread:
- BRU Vulnerability root (Jun 06)
- Re: BRU Vulnerability Gavrie Philipson (Jun 07)
- Re: BRU Vulnerability Jeremy Rauch (Jun 08)
- Re: BRU Vulnerability Theo Van Dinter (Jun 11)
- Re: BRU Vulnerability terry white (Jun 11)
- Exploit to the overflow in restore Ronald Huizer [Crew] (Jun 14)
- Remote DoS attack in Networks Associates PGP Certificate Server Version 2.5 Vulnerability Ussr Labs (Jun 14)
- BEA WebLogic JSP showcode vulnerability stuart.mcclure () FOUNDSTONE COM (Jun 11)
- Re: BRU Vulnerability Jeremy Rauch (Jun 08)
- Microsoft Security Bulletin (MS00-040) Microsoft Product Security (Jun 08)
- Mission statement for LKAP(Linux Kernel Auditing Project) Bryan Paxton (Jun 08)
- Re: BRU Vulnerability Gavrie Philipson (Jun 07)