Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Possible security hole
From: lincoln () hotlink com br (Cristiano Lincoln Mattos)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 08:09:03 -0300
Quoting Christoforos Karatzinis <chka () SOLUTIONS IE>: Hi, The FW1 documentation clearly states that there is a small delay after the interface initialize's and the FW starts acting on it. It is possible to do something "bad" to it in this period... Regards, Cristiano Lincoln Mattos Recife / Brazil
The first 25 packets were lost before the interface's
initialization. The
packets with sequence number greater than 34 are droped
from the firewall.
What about the packets with sequence number 25-34? Is it
possible that
someone can use this time (after the interface's
initialization and before
the firewall's initialization) to do something bad? Regards, Christofer
Current thread:
- Re: Possible security hole Ryan Russell (Mar 28)
- Re: Possible security hole Darren Reed (Mar 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Possible security hole Cristiano Lincoln Mattos (Mar 29)
- Re: Possible security hole Warren Barrow (Mar 29)
- Re: Possible security hole Ryan Russell (Mar 29)