Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: CISCO PIX Vulnerability
From: Damir.Rajnovic () EUROCERT NET (Damir Rajnovic)
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 07:54:00 +0100
Hi there, At 19:25 -0700 3/6/98, David Wagner wrote:
In article <v03007801b19b0b9bd8f5@[194.82.141.242]> you write:CISCO PIX Private Link feature uses DES key that is only 48 bits in length.[...]Apparently, knowing what bits are fixed will not bring attacker any additional 'gain' in breaking a DES. At least I was told that by people from sci.crypt group.Either the sci.crypt folks were confused, or I am. With only 48 unknown bits in the DES key, you can break the encryption 2^8 = 256 times faster than you can break DES. This is a serious weakness.
Probably I was unclear. What I want to say is that it does not matter what bits inside key are known. It is the same if you know that first 8 bits are 0 or middle or end bits. In all cases you must put the same effort to break encryption. In that sense there is no 'additional gain' knowing WHAT bits are fixed it does matter only that some are fixed. Cheers, Gaus --------------------------------------------------------------- EuroCERT tel: (+44 1235) 822 382 c/o UKERNA fax: (+44 1235) 822 398 Atlas Centre Chilton, Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QS, UK
Current thread:
- CISCO PIX Vulnerability Damir Rajnovic (Jun 03)
- Re: CISCO PIX Vulnerability Rick Smith (Jun 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CISCO PIX Vulnerability David Wagner (Jun 03)
- Re: CISCO PIX Vulnerability Damir Rajnovic (Jun 03)
- FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-98:05.nfs Aleph One (Jun 04)
- Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-98:05.nfs matthew green (Jun 04)
- Huge security hole in SDRC IDEAS MS6 cad system. Sven-Ove Westberg (Jun 05)
- Security flaw in Accelerated-X 4.1 Stefan Laudat (Jun 08)
- Re: CISCO PIX Vulnerability Damir Rajnovic (Jun 05)
- Re: CISCO PIX Vulnerability Jamie Thain (Jun 20)