Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Intel Pentium Bug

From: dgaudet-list-bugtraq () ARCTIC ORG (Dean Gaudet)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 19:27:49 -0800


Just an idle thought ... since this instruction includes the LOCK prefix
perhaps the processor dies while still signalling LOCK... maybe a modified
watchdog card could notice this situation and generate an NMI, yadda
yadda.

Dean

Current thread:

WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug ZombieMan (Nov 06)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Stefan Hudson (Nov 07)
  - Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug whiz (Nov 07)
  - Re: Intel Pentium Bug George Imburgia (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug Kragen \ (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug Chris Pascoe (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug Stefan Hudson (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug Aleph One (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug Eric Allman (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug Dean Gaudet (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug Dean Gaudet (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug Colin Jenkins (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug George Imburgia (Nov 07)
    - Re: Intel Pentium Bug Travis Hassloch (Nov 11)
  - Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Alan Cox (Nov 08)
    - Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Roger Espel Llima (Nov 09)
  - solaris (fwd) Rob Hagopian (Nov 09)
    - Re: solaris (fwd) Corey Lindsly (Nov 09)
    - Re: solaris (fwd) James Lockwood (Nov 09)
    - Re: solaris (fwd) Dalvenjah FoxFire (Nov 09)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Kurt Seifried (Nov 07)

(Thread continues...)