Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: BUG in /bin/bash
From: bmc () telebase com (Brian Clapper)
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:46:44 -0400
"Red" == Red Barchetta <paradox () pegasus rutgers edu> writes:
Their test string "bash -c 'ls\377who'" gave this output on my Solaris
2.5 system:
bash: ls377who: command not found
Can anyone verify that this is really a problem?
Ernie Pistor
It's a problem on my BSD/OS 2.1 system running bash version 1.14.5(1). Thankfully, on the BSD variants (at least the ones we use), bash != sh. ---- Brian Clapper .............................................. bmc () telebase com http://www.netaxs.com/~bmc/ ............. PGP public key available on request Daring ideas are like chessmen moved forward, they may be beaten, but they may start a winning game. -- J. W. von Goethe
Current thread:
- Vulnerability in the Xt library, (continued)
- Vulnerability in the Xt library Aleph One (Aug 24)
- Re: Vulnerability in the Xt library Stefan `Sec` Zehl (Aug 25)
- Re: Vulnerability in the Xt library Mike Neuman (Aug 27)
- Re: Vulnerability in the Xt library Casper Dik (Aug 28)
- Re: Vulnerability in the Xt library Mike Neuman (Aug 28)
- RFD: libsuid VaX#n8 (Aug 24)
- More on UnixWare 2.x vulnerability Todd Vierling (Aug 24)
- Re: (WORKAROUND) More on UnixWare 2.x vulnerability Hannu Laurila (Aug 24)
- polyglots (multi-language programs) John Nemeth (Aug 24)