Ray Cromwell: Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!

[perry () piermont com (Perry E. Metzger)]

That last one may have been a false alarm, but the buffer overflow bug
is 100% real -- you can try it very easily.

------- Forwarded Message

From: Ray Cromwell <rjc () clark net>
Message-Id: <199509220836.EAA14476 () clark net>
Subject: Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!
To: rjc () clark net (Ray Cromwell)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 04:36:56 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: cypherpunks () toad com
In-Reply-To: <199509220830.EAA13828 () clark net> from "Ray Cromwell" at Sep 22, 95 04:30:03 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha3]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 521
Sender: owner-cypherpunks () toad com
Precedence: bulk
X-UIDL: 811769872.045



Disregard that last message. Those drugs I was taking must have just kicked
in. I was running another program in the background which coincidentally
brought up an xterm at the same time I clicked on the link. Damn,
and I thought I had found another bug. Ah well. There's probably one lurking
there somewhere. It was good while it lasted. When I hit "send" and
that xterm popped up, I almost jumped out of my seat. ;-) Remember
this lesson, you should always try to repeat your bugs atleast three
times. ;-)

- -Ray








------- End of Forwarded Message