Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Got this - not sure of authenticity. Better safe etc...
From: bet () std sbi com (Bennett Todd)
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 14:07:58 -0500 (EST)
Yup. Those email viruses are almost as dangerous as artificially intelligent network packets.
Well, I know nothing about this report, but I've heard of a "virus" (more like a worm, actually) carried via email: as I recall, IBM's internal network (VNET?) was shut down by a christmas card that retransmitted itself to everyone in the receipient's phonebook. AOL has all kinds of cleverness for automagically downloading new versions of its own client software, so this virus report didn't strike me as intrinsically unbelievable. -Bennett
Current thread:
- Got this - not sure of authenticity. Better safe etc... Doug Hughes (Dec 05)
- Re: Got this - not sure of authenticity. Better safe etc... Perry E. Metzger (Dec 05)
- Re: Got this - not sure of authenticity. Better safe etc... Bennett Todd (Dec 06)
- Re: Got this - not sure of authenticity. Better safe etc... Sean Allen (Dec 06)
- Virus's peter theobald (Dec 06)
- Re: Virus's Zygo Blaxell (Dec 07)
- Re: Got this - not sure of authenticity. Better safe etc... Bennett Todd (Dec 06)
- Re: Got this - not sure of authenticity. Better safe etc... Perry E. Metzger (Dec 05)
- Virus's Bill Broadley (Dec 05)
- virii? Richard Forno (Dec 05)
- Re: virii? Dave Williss (Dec 07)
- Re: Virus's Rafi Sadowsky (Dec 06)
- Re: Virus's -- This is an Emacs bomb Charles Howes (Dec 06)
- Re: Virus's -- This is an Emacs bomb Dave Goldberg (Dec 06)
- Re: Virus's -- This is an Emacs bomb Rens Troost (Dec 06)
- virii? Richard Forno (Dec 05)